Who would you rather build a team around...

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BigGameDamian, Oct 29, 2012.

  1. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    I think it was ever to play as a blazer.

    But as for griffin; I think he will have a Larry Johnson career. He will have an injury that will hamper his athleticism and he will become a mediocre player after/
     
  2. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,037
    Likes Received:
    57,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Ummmm no.

    Right now, this season, Aldridge is playing much better than Griffin... but Blake's rookie numbers were insane.

    22.5 ppg, 12.1 boards, 3.8 assists, and 50% FG

    Compare that to Aldridge's current numbers

    21 ppg, 8.9 rebounds, 2.6 assists, 47.7% FG
     
  3. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,208
    Likes Received:
    30,347
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I guess I'll add my 2 cents to this thread. I'd go along with those who have said that the correct answer is "neither". As far as I can recall, only one championship team has been built around the PF position: the Duncan-era Spurs. Most titles have been won by teams with elite wing players. The Blazers clearly don't have one of those and I don't know if they can find a way to get one. Assuming that they have to go the Detroit route, then I think Aldridge would be the better choice since he's more willing to blend his skills with his teammates, IMO. Love is a very talented player, but my sense is that he wants to be the star and is the more selfish player.
     
  4. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,037
    Likes Received:
    57,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    The interesting thing is, would the Spurs have won without Parker or Ginobili? I think Tony Parker is just as much a reason why they won as Duncan.
     
  5. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,208
    Likes Received:
    30,347
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    No doubt, but Duncan has been the centerpiece to the franchise since Robinson retired.
     
  6. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    They won a title without Parker and ginobli. Their first championship was Duncan, Robinson and Sean Elliot.
     
  7. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,037
    Likes Received:
    57,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Okay, they won with one of the top 50 players in league history and an excellent bench full of veterans who had been there before in a lockout shortened season. Their dominance wasn't until the 00's when Robinson was gone. The team was at its best in 03, 05, and 07. Those are all with Parker at the helm.
     

Share This Page