Lakers aren't a very good team - but they are better than they were at the begining of the season. Can the Blazers say the same?
As weird as the Blazer freewill to me is that the Blazers are ahead of NO, Houston and Utah. I guess we aren't the only ones struggling.
Ban these posters! Sedatedfork tlongII mook HCP oldmangrouch Mediocre Man Pinwheel1 brooklynballer wizenheimer Wizard Mentor Rastapopoulos PtldPlatypus Blazer4ever OSUBlazerfan EL PRESIDENTE Voodoo BigGameDamian TBpup ripcityboy kjironman1 chzbrgr Five Second Violation Gronk Brady calvin natt Irish Trader
lol, this is a rather embarrassing thread for many. I don't care how great the lakers are or how bad the Blazers could ever be, I would rather not vote than vote for the lakers to have a better record.
I almost never point out when people were wrong in their predictions of the future from 6 months or a year or 2 years ago because my predictions often suck too. All glass houses on that street
It never ceases to amaze me how little people, not just on this board, but also so-called NBA experts who should know better, value chemistry in making their pre-season predictions as to how teams are going to do. The Lakers had about as much chemistry as a three-way between Trump, Bernie and Hillary.
Exactly. Dame is the kind of leader who makes sure the rest of his team knows that he's got their backs. LeBron is the kind of "leader" who is willing to throw teammates under the bus.