Why are people so down on the Richardson to Charlotte trade?

Discussion in 'NBA General' started by BrewCityBuck, Jul 20, 2007.

  1. Celtic Fan

    Celtic Fan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,290
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't think anyone is calling him a franchise player.a solide 2 guard who is only 26 years old and hitting his prime productive years as well as someone who improves their talent at the posistion and can help this very young team... yup, I'd say he's that.I hardly think he's worn out. There were a lot of injured players last year for some reason.he's plenty young enough to bounce back.p.s. Baron Davis is WAY more fragile than J-Rich
     
  2. the_pestilence

    the_pestilence BBW VIP

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I don't like it for the Warriors because, while it helps in the long term, it pretty much insures missing the playoffs next season unless another deal is made.
     
  3. l?ckdown

    l?ckdown BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    it's not as great for the warriors, because Davis isn't gonna be the same player but the time he gets to his best. It's not bad for the warriors, but they do need another player for them
     
  4. Arrpy

    Arrpy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    890
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I think it was a really good trade for the Bobcats. They didn't need to get any younger because they were already young enough, so they traded their draft pick for a veterian wing player. I can't see what wrong with that deal...
     
  5. Let Em Hear This

    Let Em Hear This BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (tHe_pEsTiLeNcE @ Jul 22 2007, 02:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't like it for the Warriors because, while it helps in the long term, it pretty much insures missing the playoffs next season unless another deal is made.</div>I disagree. If B-Diddy can stay healthy for 65+ games, they can make a push for the playoffs.This is how I see the West playoff seeding:1. Spurs2. Mavs3. Suns4. Jazz5. Rockets6. Nuggets7. Warriors8. Hornets
     
  6. primetime

    primetime Get Your Popcorn ready again

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    4,968
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    The Warriors are still a good team after this. With Monta Ellis breaking out they are more then suitable at SG, especially when you add guys like Pietrus and Steven Jackson, they are still strong at that SG-SF spot. Add to it that Harrington now has more room in the offense, and more experience in that offense and they are a very young team and I expect them to be back in the playoffs unless major injuries happen to Baron Davis.
     
  7. Clangus

    Clangus BBW Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CelticFan @ Jul 21 2007, 03:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I like that trade better than the Celtics Trade...</div>What didn't you like about that trade? I thouhght it was good for both teams?Well we got the slightly better end of it - but we'll see who does what next year I spose (in regaurds to Ray v what we got)<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BrewCityBuck @ Jul 22 2007, 03:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sean May, when healthy is one of the most underrated young PF's in the league,duo.</div>I couldn't agree more. I think if he stays healthy he could have a breakout year!!!!
     

Share This Page