Why does Toronto have a better record than us?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by KingSpeed, Dec 15, 2017.

  1. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    How can you think that?

    Actually, they’ve lost fewer games.
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  2. KingSpeed

    KingSpeed Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,908
    Likes Received:
    21,060
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    actor
    Location:
    New York
    Aminu?
     
  3. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    65,694
    Likes Received:
    51,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
  4. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,143
    Likes Received:
    23,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    crap, I was going to say that.

    About once a decade MM & I are in agreement.
     
  5. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tunchi/GrandJury has annoyed some of you Lowry haters so much, you can't seem to view the matter objectively.

    Dame > Lowry and CJ possibly > Derozan, but Lowry + Derozan >> Dame + CJ.

    Toronto's supporting cast is a little better than ours, but not enough to explain away the consistent disparity in records. It's all about balance, and the comparison between the two teams is exactly why our redundant back court is such a problem if we want to escape middle of the pack territory.

    1 + 1 = 1.5
     
    HailBlazers and GrandJury like this.
  6. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    And your “objective” data on which you’re basing this assertion is what again?

    Based purely on my own observations, I’d say Dame and CJ aren’t on the court together for more than about 24 mpg. During those times, the Blazers typically out-score their opponents. It’s when Dame goes to the bench that leads are generally coughed up. It’s not the Dame -CJ pairing that’s an issue in guard play, it’s the backups. That said, by far the biggest issue for the Blazers is inconsistent play from the 3-5 spots that separates them from the elite teams. Look at the experience and productivity of those positions for the Blazers vs the Raptors and I think the question posed by the OP is answered.
     
  7. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Just a quick comparison, Lillard and McCollum are averaging 47.2 ppg out of the Blazers' overall scoring average of 102.7 ppg. Lowry and DeRozan are averaging a combined 39.8 ppg out of the Raptors' team scoring average of 110.9 ppg.

    It's not the back-courts that's responsible for the differential, it's the balance provided by an experienced and productive front-court and bench.
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  8. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The very next line:

    "Toronto's supporting cast is a little better than ours, but not enough to explain away the consistent disparity in records."

    If our back court's overall impact is comparable to Toronto's, then our records should be very similar based on the respective supporting casts. Toronto has been significantly better than us during the tenure of those lineups, however.

    The box scores tend to show Dame with a better stat line but CJ with a better +/-. How good we are with one or the other court tends to track well with how we've done when Dame was out with injury.
     
  9. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    18,844
    Likes Received:
    15,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    West > East
     
    Orion Bailey likes this.
  10. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Statistics rarely capture team-oriented pictures. It's the back court's responsibility for getting the rest of the players involved, and whether it's the fault of CJ/Dame or the abilities of their teammates, we've done quite poorly in that regard.

    And there's the defense... No matter how much our back court has improved, they're nowhere near the level of Toronto's.
     
  11. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Sorry, but that's not a logical conclusion. There are three other players on the court at any given time for a given team. Toronto's are consistently better than ours.
     
  12. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I'll agree there, although it's time to start giving Dame some credit for his significantly better defense this year. CJ? Not so much.
     
  13. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    And that line really annoys me. It implies that the respective front courts are comparable in terms of ability to finish a play. How many times has Dame or CJ delivered a great pass to a teammate only to have them blow a layup or open shot? You can only get an assist when the teammate finishes what you've set up.
     
  14. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,303
    Likes Received:
    64,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dame way more than CJ....but it's a valid pt about assists...CJ passed better last two games I noticed...the defensive improvement by this team doesn't get much credit this season but it's a big leap.....CJ is a bright guy....he'll figure it out..Dame has it already
     
  15. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    42,642
    Likes Received:
    24,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Way more than you know
     
  16. speeds

    speeds $2.50 highball, $1.50 beer Staff Member Administrator GFX Team

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    39,328
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Definitely helps that the East is more volatile.

    I terms of personnel I think it's less to do with Toronto's "other" starters and more to do with consistent bench play.
     
    riverman likes this.
  17. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't see their #3-12 lineup being significantly better than ours. Swap our supporting cast with theirs and I think both teams retain similar records. You may not agree with the premise, but that doesn't make the conclusion illogical.

    Did you skip over the part where I said, "whether it's the fault of CJ/Dame or the abilities of their teammates"?
     
  18. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    66,303
    Likes Received:
    64,441
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think when you factor in we lost 4 games by a total of about 9 pts early and lost other close ones...I don't think the Raptors are that much deeper..but I do think they have better chemistry on offense than we show this season
     
  19. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    23,213
    Likes Received:
    28,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I think that's a pretty tough position to back up. The Raptors other 3 starters are:

    Ibaka (13.7 PPG/16.3 PER)
    Valencunias (11.2 PPG/20.6 PER)
    Miles (9.9 PPG/ 15 PER)
    Bench scoring production is an average of 48 PPG.

    For the Blazers, you have:

    Aminu (9.8 PPG/13.3 PER)
    Nurkic (14.8 PPG/15 PER)
    Turner (7.8 PPG/8.2 PER)
    Bench scoring production is an average of 40.5 PPG.

    While I'm not a big believer in PER, it's pretty tough to argue that only having one other starter who's even rated average in that stat is not a good thing. Every starter on the Raptor's squad is rated average or better.

    Actually, I did initially skip over that part. Sorry about that.

    IIRC, you're in the trade CJ camp? Perhaps that's coloring your thoughts about the relative strengths of the Raptors' and Blazers' back courts. I think that they're pretty darned close in overall capability. I think the primary reason that the Raptors have the better record is that their other starters are better/more experienced than ours. If I could replace McCollum with DeRozan, I would do it simply because of the size and experience advantage. I think we both know that's not happening.
     
    riverman likes this.
  20. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But, to be fair, how many people here think that's our best lineup? Bench scoring is a better metric, but the '80s Celtics teams showed you can make the bench a near non-issue if need be. The bench strength is generally situational, so I'm not sure I place a lot of value on its averages.

    Yes and no. I was one of the earliest proponents of breaking up the redundant back court. As extremely unpopular as the position was, I felt the best move was to keep CJ and trade Dame for a king's ransom. Keep the player just as good, possibly better, and move the one with more trade value. You might recall I said something to the effect of, if you're not at least willing to ask the question (which to trade), you already got the answer wrong.

    It's only recently that I've started feeling CJ needs to be traded. I think there's a fracture within the team, but they're too professional a bunch of guys to air dirty laundry. Dame and CJ are Public Relations personified.

    So no, my thoughts on trading CJ don't affect my opinion of our back court vs Toronto's. What is relevant is my long-held belief that management hitched its wagon to a sinking ship (how's that for a mixed metaphor?), and Portland fans are too emotional to allow the right decision to be made. I can't really bring myself to give a damn about the highs and lows of this inconsistent team until they fix that situation and assemble a sensible lineup.
     

Share This Page