<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pats37)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (blackadder)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MKIV_Supra)</div><div class='quotemain'> Exactly, sooner or later, BA is going to say that about the Patriots.</div> To quote Stone Cold Steve Austin, "What!?" It will eventually apply to all AFC East teams north of the mason-dixon line.</div> As long as Kraft owns the Pats we'll be around</div> idk, he was successful with parcells/belichek. But he couldnt win with pete carroll. Obviously Carroll is a good coach and a winner. So, obviously the success cant be attributed to just him being around. They didnt win super bowls without brady, so maybe brady the reason they are good, but they missed playoffs with him. So really, it is obviously not one factor, and all the pieces have to stay in place, or equal pieces. Like a . . . TEAM. If they keep cap, it is unlikely they will be able to maintain high level of success for a long period of time, without down years. Injuries will happen, etc, etc, etc. They may be more successful over a period than any other team, but they will have years when they arent around, and just plain suck
