I'm not against Scalma here; we can find a rookie who can do what Pat does; he'll just cost more and probably be boring.
That's not what Pat makes, nor is that what Pat will be making next season, so I don't see the point.
Shedbazz Napier-Davis is obviously our sixth man. Also, If you figure out how to offload Turner, you keep Patty C; he'll give you Evan Turner stats for 1/5th the price, which is almost the correct value for that performance.
Just curious, Nurkic, Davis, Pat, & Bazz.... We probably can't resign all of them and go so far over the cap. Who is the one man gone in this equation?
I kinda get where Scalma is coming from: a 26th pick will make 1.4 million a year, which is what Patty C is making now, but is a 26th pick a guarantee of quality? There have been 64 #26 picks, and only 49 ever played a minute in the NBA. Of those, only 17 have a WS/48 better than Patty C's. Of those, only 7 are guards. So in 63 years of the draft, seven guards are better than Patty C. ...of course, one of them was Dave Twardzik (the greatest 26th pick ever!) so maybe we're biased in favor of them.
1) Pat; 2) Bazz Depending on what Neil thinks of the other backup PGs and Wings. Neither is irreplaceable if their asking price is too high.
Fun fact, Pat Connaughton is already the 11th winningest (total Win Shares) 41st pick of all time. He's the 3rd best all-time at 3P%. I guess if you're hoping we draft the next Cuttino Mobley, though, then yeah, he's easily replaceable by a rookie.