People here are all up in his shit, but a lot of radio guys saying we are scheming well by making his work on defense
And this is why I root against some fans. I am not a homer. I try to see both sides to the story. Yes, our guys have shot poorly, but so has their best player. As ell as we have gotten a HOF level 2 games out of Aldridge. If you see something different then I have no use for you. As stated in another thread, the best players win games. Aldridge has been the best player and we have won both games. If that stops though, things might go a different way. When the Mavs won their title, Dirk went into Bird/West/Wilt mode and carried that team to the title. I don't get wrapped up in all the asinine homerism.
Here's the thing, there's people that are unbiased who offer analysis on both sides. You're just unpleasant. You think you're keeping it real, but you know what...... you're not
Game One I thought it was him. Game Two, however, made me reconsider. I watched Nico and Wes switch off on him and noticed they were doing a terrific job in both playing him tight AND not letting him draw contact when he jumped.
I find that most "realists" actually lean pessimist rather than neutral. It's a natural element when trying to talk to homerism.
Fuck you I have no use for you either. Just trying to figure out by your comments (and knowing you are a Blazer fan who lives near the Houston area) which team you wanted to see win. You seem disappointed in Houston's play . . . but I'm probably reading your posts wrong.
Quote Originally Posted by Blazinaway: Hi MM, haven't seen you posting much, hope you are well. Did you enjoy game 1? MM: "Dont take this in a trollish way, but not at all" I'm not sure how someone rooting for the Blazers got zero enjoyment out of game 1? Again I may be reading into to it wrong, but there is certainly grounds for me to wonder.
