Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stotts was better than Chauncey to this point. Still not sure he was the coach to get them to the championship but he was a very good coach.Did he get more out of his rag tag misfits surrounding Dame?
The grass isn't greener holds true at times.
Stotts was better than Chauncey to this point. Still not sure he was the coach to get them to the championship but he was a very good coach.
He did fail to land us quality lottery odds on a consistent basis.
Do you miss Olshey too?!? Those dudes had a decade to try and win and they tread the waters of mediocrity almost the entire time. You don't get to stay one of the longest tenured coaches in the league when you don't win any games past the second round of the playoffs.Did he get more out of his rag tag misfits surrounding Dame?
The grass isn't greener holds true at times.
I, however, do not miss first round exits.I miss the playoffs.
Did he get more out of his rag tag misfits surrounding Dame?
The grass isn't greener holds true at times.
I, however, do not miss first round exits.
Nope. Great guy and wish him well in MIL.
It took Will Barton getting traded to Denver and no one being available at guard for CJ to get minutes. He rode his starters too hard and did not allow players on the end of the bench to grow.
Casuals? Hah.I'm not sure I'd say that I miss him.
He clearly wasn't the problem back then, but became the scape-goat for the casuals.
Ah, I miss these discussions, where you attribute players looking good here to Stotts without specific reasons, while I attribute them to Dame (and to a lesser extent, CJ) being able to generate them open looks.These are some weird narratives.
- CJ had injuries to start his career and was behind Wes Matthews, who got a max contract based off how well he played in Portland.
- He was starting guys that were end of the bench players elsewhere and actually made the majority of them the most productive they've ever been
- Very very few of the players he didn't play much went elsewhere to be significant contributors. As noted before, the opposite was more likely to happen.
Not sure what your definition of a good coach is? Pretty sure if a guy has been in and around the league as long as Stotts who also happens to have a championship ring he a good coach. I'm also betting you could ask most any of the players he coached other than maybe Nurk who doesn't seem to like any coach what they felt about him and they would disagree with you.Not at all. He’s a mediocre-at-best coach.
Only fucking idiots think he’s a good coach.
This conversation will continue while Billups continues to underperform. IMHO Chauncey has one more year to get things going. If he cannot make it out of the lottery again then it might be time to move on. Blazers need to upgrade the roster then either perform with Chauncey or go after a top notch coach.Ah, I miss these discussions, where you attribute players looking good here to Stotts without specific reasons, while I attribute them to Dame (and to a lesser extent, CJ) being able to generate them open looks.
People need to move on.
Yes, Blazers need to upgrade the roster. However, if they don't, it will be difficult to blame Chauncey for another lottery berth.This conversation will continue while Billups continues to underperform. IMHO Chauncey has one more year to get things going. If he cannot make it out of the lottery again then it might be time to move on. Blazers need to upgrade the roster then either perform with Chauncey or go after a top notch coach.
Unfortunately we might be stuck in this cycle until we see new ownership.
Tough being a Blazer fan sometimes.
