Oregon Ducks 2012-2013 Schedule

Zalsa · Feb 2, 2012

So, who will be on next year's schedule?

Ed O · Feb 5, 2012

http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-12/pac-10/2012-oregon-ducks-football-schedule.php

Ed O.

Zalsa · Feb 5, 2012

4 away games and 7 home games. Not bad. The Pac-12 north championship game is probably an extra home game at that too, unless USC goes undefeated.

Sinobas · Feb 5, 2012

Wow, 5 out of their first 6 games at Autzen.

Why do we get 3 more home games than road games? How does that work?

It's nice that we got a big name SEC team to come to Autzen, but that game at USC will be HUGE time for some revenge!

Zalsa · Feb 5, 2012

SEC Team? Wat

Ed O · Feb 5, 2012

Sinobas said:
Why do we get 3 more home games than road games? How does that work?

It's nice that we got a big name SEC team to come to Autzen, but that game at USC will be HUGE time for some revenge!

It's Tennessee TECH.

We have more home games because we pay teams like Arkansas State, Fresno State and Tennessee Tech to come in and get their butts kicked.

Arkansas State actually has improved lately and Michael Dyer (remember him in the BCS Title game?) just transferred there. Hopefully he doesn't beat us again. Haha.

Ed O.

Ed O · Feb 5, 2012

See this for more:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...sfer-why-he-gus-malzahn-will-win-big-together

Ed O.

Zalsa · Feb 6, 2012

Ed O said:
It's Tennessee TECH.

We have more home games because we pay teams like Arkansas State, Fresno State and Tennessee Tech to come in and get their butts kicked.

Arkansas State actually has improved lately and Michael Dyer (remember him in the BCS Title game?) just transferred there. Hopefully he doesn't beat us again. Haha.

Ed O.

Which means if we beat Arkansas State, we have a better chance of rising in the ranks.

But still, none of those schools are SEC teams

Ed O · Feb 6, 2012

Zalsa said:
Which means if we beat Arkansas State, we have a better chance of rising in the ranks.

But still, none of those schools are SEC teams

You're totally right about no SEC teams. I think he might have read it as "Tennessee" without the "Tech" part. But just a guess.

Arkansas State has improved, and is a dangerous opponent as far as smaller programs go, but it still will be more of a black eye if we lose than a feather in our cap if we win.

Ed O.

Sinobas · Feb 6, 2012

Oh, I thought the schedule said Arkansas, and that we'd finally been able to book a big name team to come to Autzen.

@USC looks like the only challenging game of the season.

Ed O · Feb 6, 2012

I think that the last four (or five, including the P12 championship game) are all pretty tough games.

Ed O.

Sinobas · Feb 6, 2012

I don't think Stanford will have a winning season without Luck, the Beavers suck, the Bears are ok, but no match for the Ducks. And the title game will almost certainly be a tough match against USC. It would be sweet to beat them twice in one year.

LikeLamike · Feb 6, 2012

Stanford pulled in a better recruiting class than we did filling almost all areas that they needed to replace. They will still be good and I wouldn't be shocked to see them rattle of 8 or 9 wins

Zalsa · Feb 7, 2012

But do they have a good QB?

I don't see one as good as Luck, and their only options with players with most experience running their Offenses are Robbie Picazo and Josh Nunes.

Ghost Pepper · Feb 7, 2012

The question is can USC beat us twice and can we beat them twice? The National Champioship hangs on that answer. Gotta feel good that the national championship is always in discussion for our Ducks now....

Beating USC there is HUGE, cause it puts the Pac-12 Championship in Autzen! Where it BELONGS!!!

Zalsa · Feb 7, 2012

Ghost Pepper said:
The question is can USC beat us twice and can we beat them twice? The National Champioship hangs on that answer. Gotta feel good that the national championship is always in discussion for our Ducks now....

Beating USC there is HUGE, cause it puts the Pac-12 Championship in Autzen! Where it BELONGS!!!

We did lose some key starters(LMF, D-Thomas) but so did USC(Perry, Kalil) but USC has Matt Barkely and many project them to be #1 next season and easy Natty contenders.

My guess is that somewhere along the line, Bama and LSU may slip up, Oklahoma would choke(what a surprise) and it will come down to these 4 teams for the Natty.
USC, Oregon, Michigan(if Michigan beats Alabama in the opener), and either LSU or Alabama(because either one of them can rebound).

Basically, the West will be decided in the Coliseum.

PapaG · Feb 7, 2012

Ed O said:
See this for more:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...sfer-why-he-gus-malzahn-will-win-big-together

Ed O.

Is Arkansas State immune from normal NCAA transfer rules? Seems to me that Dyer should have to sit out next season as a transfer.

Ed O · Feb 7, 2012

PapaG said:
Is Arkansas State immune from normal NCAA transfer rules? Seems to me that Dyer should have to sit out next season as a transfer.

He's reportedly asking for a waiver. We'll see if he gets one.

Ed O.

PapaG · Feb 7, 2012

Ed O said:
He's reportedly asking for a waiver. We'll see if he gets one.

Ed O.

Why on earth would he get a waiver? Because his offensive coordinator went to another school? He played for Auburn this past season. If he gets a waiver, that opens up a huge can of worms for players being able to follow a coach to another FBS school.

EDIT -

There is speculation that Dyer and Arkansas State will appeal to the NCAA for a hardship waiver due to the health of a family member. If granted, Dyer could receive immediate eligibility to play for the Red Wolves in 2012.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

132 miles from Little Rock to Jonesboro; 482 miles from Auburn to Little Rock.

Man, I just don't think that one is going to fly for the NCAA. Why would him playing matter since he also has a redshirt season available to him? Wouldn't sitting out as a transfer actually give him more time to visit his sick family member in Little Rock?

Wheels · Feb 7, 2012

unless they claim that It would help with said family member being able to see their child/grandchild/relative play? Doubt that would fly though. I think thats what they argued with Seastrunk in Baylor

Ghost Pepper · Feb 7, 2012

You take away Barkleys deep ball threat downfield with a rover and make him have to be a dump and dodge passser for short yardage gains and have to work a long drive down the field and he will be exposed! Our defense will put paint on him!! Further our ducks can strike in 45 seconds, he'll have to be flawless next year, cause we're not going to spot him a three td cushion like last year....

Zalsa · Feb 7, 2012

Ghost Pepper said:
You take away Barkleys deep ball threat downfield with a rover and make him have to be a dump and dodge passser for short yardage gains and have to work a long drive down the field and he will be exposed! Our defense will put paint on him!! Further our ducks can strike in 45 seconds, he'll have to be flawless next year, cause we're not going to spot him a three td cushion like last year....

True, our secondary has grown up, but so has Barkley and his recievers, and SC's running game ain't so bad either to burn off the clock.

RoyToy · Feb 8, 2012

I like that the Ducks play Colorado at home before the game vs USC

PapaG · Feb 8, 2012

RoyToy said:
I like that the Ducks play Colorado at home before the game vs USC

Sure beats UW and Stanford back-to-back on the road before USC.

Zalsa · Feb 8, 2012

PapaG said:
Sure beats UW and Stanford back-to-back on the road before USC.

Wouldn't that help us rise through the standings though? We have better opponents than Choklahoma

PapaG · Feb 8, 2012

Zalsa said:
Wouldn't that help us rise through the standings though? We have better opponents than Choklahoma

I'm of the opinion that the Ducks were in a trap game against USC last year. Last game at Husky Stadium on a night where UW celebrated their split title, big game at Stanford with ESPN Gameday there the next week, and then USC at home after winning both of those games.

If Oregon goes undefeated next year, they'll likely have beaten USC twice, and will have beaten Stanford once. That would be enough to get to another BCS title game. Lose a game, and the schedule comes into play. The Pac-10/12 has never put a team with a loss in a BCS title game before, and I don't expect it to change anytime soon.

Ghost Pepper · Feb 8, 2012

I don't think there's a chance in hell that USC beats us twice in a year! NO way!!!

Zalsa · Feb 9, 2012

If Oregon does go undefeated, then they may get #3, but remember, USC is our only quality opponent, maybe Stanford and UW, and the slimmiest chance being Utah. USC has Notre Dame and the same teams I mentioned above with ORegon as their quality opponent.

It's gonna be hell come the Ducks to the Coliseum. If we do beat them in the Coliseum, then great. Revenge for Autzen. However, they WILL win the south unless Utah nuts up and we have a rematch.

Is it possible for USC and the Ducks to be #1/#2 by the time of the Pac-12 Title Game?

Wheels · Feb 9, 2012

Zalsa said:
Is it possible for USC and the Ducks to be #1/#2 by the time of the Pac-12 Title Game?

not very likely, as that would require Oregon or USC to have 1 loss to get the rematch. Pac12, nor any school not from the SEC, would get that kind of love IMO, unless a crap load of teams lose 2 games above them in the rankings I guess.

Natebishop3 · Feb 9, 2012

We're playing them again next season? I thought we switched off seasons because we didn't play UCLA this year.

Oregon Ducks 2012-2013 Schedule

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I like salsa

Administrator

I like salsa

Banned User

I like salsa

Administrator

Administrator

I like salsa

Administrator

Banned User

Administrator

Banned User

Member

I like salsa

Active Member

I like salsa

Banned User

Administrator

Banned User

Is That A Challenge?!?!1!

Active Member

I like salsa

Clown Town

Banned User

I like salsa

Banned User

Active Member

I like salsa

Is That A Challenge?!?!1!

Don't tread on me!

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread