Zombie Steph Curry

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Do we have to give up Hickson? I'd part with Babbitt/Nolan and #10 for him.
 
Actually, we really don't need him. Lillard can play like this too.
 
The only thing that can hold Curry back is health. That is no little thing with him though.
 
He was already my favorite non-Blazer before the playoffs but he is solidifying the Warriors as my 2nd favorite team. He is so much fun to watch especially when he gets hot. I fully expected that half court shot to go in at the end of the quarter last night. I really really hope he can stay healthy.
 
is pretty good. Offer GSW Hickson and Nolan for him?

We'd also have to throw in a player to be named later (perhaps a 3rd string stretch 4) and future considerations to get that deal done.
 
Golden State fans have to be torn. They're no doubt enjoying this moment, but they must be aware that God gives them these moments (like the victory over Dallas in the first round where Baron Davis was briefly the best player on the planet) only because the rest of the time he's crapping on the franchise. (Cue ominous musing, and camera slowly pans in closer and closer on Curry's ankles. And Bogut's.)
 
Would golden state even consider trading curry? I don't know man, this guy is damn good!
 
Would golden state even consider trading curry? I don't know man, this guy is damn good!

Only if their inside information said that he was damaged goods for life. Even then they would ask for the world.
 
Would a mod change the title to this thread to a green font, please?
 
Love watching him play! I was wrong about him though. Thought there was no way this kid from a small college who happened to have a good run in the Tourney(like many before him) was going to end up this good.

Just worried about his jello ankles. He tweaks them just by sneezing!
 
I just keep thinking how Kahn could have a backcourt of (Brandon Jennings or Jrue Holiday) and Curry right now with Ty Lawson coming off the bench...that, combined with giving Love a 5yr max, he might still have a job.
 
Golden State fans have to be torn. They're no doubt enjoying this moment, but they must be aware that God gives them these moments (like the victory over Dallas in the first round where Baron Davis was briefly the best player on the planet) only because the rest of the time he's crapping on the franchise. (Cue ominous musing, and camera slowly pans in closer and closer on Curry's ankles. And Bogut's.)

We can't all be blessed with Portland's myriad first round playoff exits to quell our expectations and adequately prepare us for the disappointment of our players' inevitable knee collapses.

I've never come across a fan base so incredibly jealous of whatever golden boy has the spot light at any given time.
 
I'm loving the Warriors and I loved them in 2007 too. I still remember Matt Barnes crying after Baron dunked on AK. Great moment.
 
We can't all be blessed with Portland's myriad first round playoff exits to quell our expectations and adequately prepare us for the disappointment of our players' inevitable knee collapses.

I've never come across a fan base so incredibly jealous of whatever golden boy has the spot light at any given time.

Oh come now don't lump us all together with Ras, thats just cruel.
 
Sorry about the dredged thread. During the Dallas game the other night, BP was lamenting to me how much he misses Steph Curry...and that we really, REALLY should have found a way to keep him. I told him we couldn't afford Curry due to cap-related constraints. BP replied that, since we're over the cap anyway, what difference does it make. I didn't really have a great answer to give. Anyone want to weigh-in with some more specific insights on this debate? Thanks in advance.
 
Sorry about the dredged thread. During the Dallas game the other night, BP was lamenting to me how much he misses Steph Curry...and that we really, REALLY should have found a way to keep him. I told him we couldn't afford Curry due to cap-related constraints. BP replied that, since we're over the cap anyway, what difference does it make. I didn't really have a great answer to give. Anyone want to weigh-in with some more specific insights on this debate? Thanks in advance.

You mean Seth?

Yeah it would have been nice. The correct answer is 1.) Blazers would have hard capped and not been able to pull off the Whiteside trade, etc 2.) Curry wanted more money than the minimum.
 
You mean Seth?

Yeah it would have been nice. The correct answer is 1.) Blazers would have hard capped and not been able to pull off the Whiteside trade, etc 2.) Curry wanted more money than the minimum.

:biglaugh:

Yeah...Steph. I haven't yet had my third cup of coffee.

Thanks! :cheers:
 
Sorry about the dredged thread. During the Dallas game the other night, BP was lamenting to me how much he misses Steph Curry...and that we really, REALLY should have found a way to keep him. I told him we couldn't afford Curry due to cap-related constraints. BP replied that, since we're over the cap anyway, what difference does it make. I didn't really have a great answer to give. Anyone want to weigh-in with some more specific insights on this debate? Thanks in advance.

You know, he could just come back under the new name he created, and find out himself that he's wrong.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top