Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
is pretty good. Offer GSW Hickson and Nolan for him?
Would golden state even consider trading curry? I don't know man, this guy is damn good!
Would golden state even consider trading curry? I don't know man, this guy is damn good!
But HICKSON AND NOLAN, MAN, HICKSON AND NOLAN!!!!
STEPH WOULD BE GREAT AS DAMIAN'S BACKUP!!1!
I just keep thinking how Kahn could have a backcourt of (Brandon Jennings or Jrue Holiday) and Curry right now with Ty Lawson coming off the bench...that, combined with giving Love a 5yr max, he might still have a job.
Golden State fans have to be torn. They're no doubt enjoying this moment, but they must be aware that God gives them these moments (like the victory over Dallas in the first round where Baron Davis was briefly the best player on the planet) only because the rest of the time he's crapping on the franchise. (Cue ominous musing, and camera slowly pans in closer and closer on Curry's ankles. And Bogut's.)
We can't all be blessed with Portland's myriad first round playoff exits to quell our expectations and adequately prepare us for the disappointment of our players' inevitable knee collapses.
I've never come across a fan base so incredibly jealous of whatever golden boy has the spot light at any given time.
Actually, we really don't need him. Lillard can play like this too.
STEPH WOULD BE GREAT AS DAMIAN'S BACKUP!!1!
Sorry about the dredged thread. During the Dallas game the other night, BP was lamenting to me how much he misses Steph Curry...and that we really, REALLY should have found a way to keep him. I told him we couldn't afford Curry due to cap-related constraints. BP replied that, since we're over the cap anyway, what difference does it make. I didn't really have a great answer to give. Anyone want to weigh-in with some more specific insights on this debate? Thanks in advance.
You mean Seth?
Yeah it would have been nice. The correct answer is 1.) Blazers would have hard capped and not been able to pull off the Whiteside trade, etc 2.) Curry wanted more money than the minimum.


Sorry about the dredged thread. During the Dallas game the other night, BP was lamenting to me how much he misses Steph Curry...and that we really, REALLY should have found a way to keep him. I told him we couldn't afford Curry due to cap-related constraints. BP replied that, since we're over the cap anyway, what difference does it make. I didn't really have a great answer to give. Anyone want to weigh-in with some more specific insights on this debate? Thanks in advance.
