Rumor Trade Deadline: March 25, 12:00 p.m. Pacific (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

What does the Blazers roster look like March 26?

  • Major Improvement

  • Minor Change

  • 'That was it?"

  • Olshey is relaxing in his valet car with champagne dreaming of Los Angeles

Results are only viewable after voting.
TBpup

TBpup

Writing Team
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
22,664
Likes
34,668
Points
113
Rumors starting to flow fast and furious, but will Blazer fans have anything to look forward to?

Various members of the Orlando Magic. Aaron Gordon (they want a lot) or Evan Fournier (a late season rental with an ending contract).

Per Sam Amick of The Athletic (subscription required), The Kings are shopping Marvin Bagley III. A former top pick who has underperformed and fallen out of favor with their current team. Sounds like an Olshey bargain bin special. Nemanja Bjelica is also rumored to be on the 'available' list.

Chicago's Lauri Markkanen has been rumored to be available due to the Bulls not wanting to pay what his camp is saying they will want in his upcoming contract.

Multiple reports have made Lonzo Ball available. Daddy Ball is chirping about him getting out as well. What teams want both of them?

There are also a number of players who are available for trade that no team seems to want to touch who should be on the Buy Out list shortly after the Trade Deadline.

Andre Drummond
LaMarcus Aldridge
Otto Porter Jr.
George Hill

Given Olshey's penchant for small moves with periphery players, any hope that the Blazers do something that actually helps this roster in a more significant way?
 
This team is on the market and so I doubt you see a blockbuster including our only block Dame. But anyone else is tradable if the Vulcans sign off.
 
We need to do some ancillary moves right now before we can get in on the buyout market due to our potential tax situation. Unless, we plan on making trades where we send out more higher salary players (Hood/Jones/Roco, etc)

Also, George Hill is on a contract worth ~10 mil right now that is partially guaranteed for next season. Why isn't there a market for him in trades? I don't think he gets bought out
 
Make a trade that opens up two more spots and leaves some room and sign Hill, Aldridge, and Porter to vet mins?. I know we can't keep everyone next season. But, maybe me win the championship this season.
 
Assuming the Aaron Gordon ship has sailed, I'm just not sure that NeO is going to upset the apple cart in any meaningful way. He may be active on the buyout market, but I don't think anyone (including LMA) would even see rotation minutes on this roster as it currently stands.

Since I don't think NeO is willing to trade CJ, I'd move Trent now as I am concerned he'll lose his value on his next contract (I am, however, open to keeping Trent if you can package CJ for forward or center). I'm not sure that the Blazers feel the same way, and I am not sure who is realistically available to provide an upgrade.

I also think that we are getting sneaky close to legitimately testing the Nurkic waters if an upgrade is possible. I am the biggest Nurkic fan there is, but if he can't stay healthy and this team can't establish chemistry, I think it needs to be considered. If you can get a wing/center upgrade or even a more mobile, defensively-minded bigman (a Jarrett Allen type), I'd be listening.
 
Mr. Robot said:
neil olshey after trade deadline: "we were aggressive in pursuit of a player who would improve our team, but there was no right deal to make" etc
Click to expand...
We actually gave up multiple picks last summer. It's not like Danny Ainge at least who just wants to massively underpay for talent and then claims a month later that he COULD have traded for a superstar but decided not to. He's kind of a snake tbh.
 
Of all the buyout candidates, I think Porter is most likely to actually get bought out. He's on a 28 mil deal and is not playing, and is expiring. I don't see a market for him in trades.

A Hood for George Hill swap gets us some more room under the tax line(~1.9 mil under). I would add a future second to that to see if we can entice OKC.

Then create enough room for Porter Jr in the buyout market. That would just be insane value.

Dame/ Hill
CJ/ Trent / Ant
Jones/ Porter / Nas
Roco / Melo
Nurk/ Kanter / Giles

The amount of defensive versatility and depth that roster offers is unbelievable. Can go super small or super big at every position. It would be a shame that the keys to that lineup be given to a guy who is completely unimaginative like Terry, but it would only be for a year.
 
I think if we do trade it will minor but I don't see us doing Olshey will ride this team the rest of the season and hoping that Nurk can help on the defense end and rumors Zach might be ready for the playoffs.
 
Would love to add someone like Tomas Satoransky as well.
 
I'd be happy with Otto porter on a buyout. Doubtful of a big deal, but still seems like something should happen with trent.
 
My favorite trade still is for Larry Nance. Have no idea if Cleveland interested, but he is a few years older than their core and they might like an established tall SG to go with their two short ones. I will give them a first round pick, Hood, Trent and Giles for Nance and Dylan Windler.
 
This definitely needed a separate thread.
 
UKRAINEFAN said:
My favorite trade still is for Larry Nance. Have no idea if Cleveland interested, but he is a few years older than their core and they might like an established tall SG to go with their two short ones. I will give them a first round pick, Hood, Trent and Giles for Nance and Dylan Windler.
Click to expand...

Hood, Simons, and a 1st for Nance Jr

Sign Hill and Porter Jr out of buyouts

Lillard/Hill
CJ/Trent
Porter/Jones Jr/Little
Roco/Nance Jr/Melo
Nurkic/Kanter/Giles
 
Chris Craig said:
Hood, Simons, and a 1st for Nance Jr

Sign Hill and Porter Jr out of buyouts

Lillard/Hill
CJ/Trent
Porter/Jones Jr/Little
Roco/Nance Jr/Melo
Nurkic/Kanter/Giles
Click to expand...

Trent or CJ need to go. The alternative is that we go into free agency and hope that nobody offers him a massive contract, or we can work out a sign and trade, or we just let him go for nothing.
 
BigGameDamian said:
I wonder what the asking price is? They would probably want CJ.
Click to expand...

The Bulls are going to have to take less than they want if they are going to trade him. Markannen wants more than he is worth to resign in FA. Teams aren't going to want to trade the farm for him.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Trent or CJ need to go. The alternative is that we go into free agency and hope that nobody offers him a massive contract, or we can work out a sign and trade, or we just let him go for nothing.
Click to expand...

Not really thinking that far ahead. Just trying to get the best roster we can on both ends going into the playoffs.
 
A Markkanen/Trent swap would make sense for both teams as Markkanen can start at the four long term so he’d be worth paying. I know the money doesn’t line up in a straight swap but they can make it work if they wanted to. For example Trent and Hood for Markkanen and Temple is pretty much equal. Would also leave room for a buyout guy.
 
Scalma said:
A Markkanen/Trent swap would make sense for both teams as Markkanen can start at the four long term so he’d be worth paying. I know the money doesn’t line up in a straight swap but they can make it work if they wanted to.
Click to expand...
why does CHI want Trent? Does Lavine want to swing to the 3? I'd be OK with Lauri long term. Neil was rumored to be after him in the 2017 draft, and has loved guys like Porzingis in the past.

Doesn't help our defense whatsover, though
 
Chris Craig said:
Hood, Simons, and a 1st for Nance Jr

Sign Hill and Porter Jr out of buyouts

Lillard/Hill
CJ/Trent
Porter/Jones Jr/Little
Roco/Nance Jr/Melo
Nurkic/Kanter/Giles
Click to expand...
Again with the Hill buyout thing. Why do people think this will happen?

And how much room do you think we have to be able to sign TWO buyout guys?

Why does Cleveland want Ant? They already have two super young frail guards as is. They have been rumored to request two first rounder for Nance.
 
illmatic99 said:
why does CHI want Trent? Does Lavine want to swing to the 3? I'd be OK with Lauri long term. Neil was rumored to be after him in the 2017 draft, and has loved guys like Porzingis in the past.

Doesn't help our defense whatsover, though
Click to expand...

They could start Trent and Lavine. White isn’t starting for them right now. Either way they can afford Trent since white is on a rookie scale and Otto is off the books in the summer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TBpup
  • Poll Poll
Trade Deadline: Feb 9 @ 3:00 p.m ET
53 54 55
Replies
2K
Views
97K
BBert
BBert
TBpup
Trade Deadline: Thursday, Feb 20, 12:00 Pacific
16 17 18
Replies
527
Views
35K
TBpup
TBpup
MAS RipCity
The Hierarchy Of Trade Value: 2010 Trail Blazers
Replies
1
Views
450
BoomChakaLaka
BoomChakaLaka
Rastapopoulos
  • Poll Poll
Does Dame fit any more?
2 3 4
Replies
106
Views
7K
wizenheimer
wizenheimer
SlyPokerDog
Guide to the NBA trade deadline: Blazers
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top