SharpesTriumph
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2018
- Messages
- 12,683
- Likes
- 11,409
- Points
- 113
It's a valid opinion. Who do you keep? Ant and Shaedon? Or just Shae? Who would want Dame? It would have to be a ~contender with great young talent and/or picks. Not sure what team fits the bill. The Heat?
If the Blazers want to build a contender it would be best to trade Dame. He's unlikely to improve or get more healthy. Sure there's a few cases of stars playing well in mid 30's but that's the exception. I understand why some never want to trade him though, and if so there is a way to rebuild with Dame here as the Lakers did with a washed up Kobe.
Keep Shae for sure.
I'm fine keeping Ant but also fine flipping him for a haul of assets. I don't see him ever as much more than CJ, which is nice, but not an all star level player on a contender.
Nurk I'd dump, but problem is him, Winslow, Hart, Payton, Little, Keon, just don't have much if any value. Especially Nurk, who might already be a big negative asset.
Jabari and Watford could be good role players on a contender, are young and cheap, so keep them. But if a team overpays ship them out, Blazers are in asset acquisition mode not final roster moves to build a contender
Grant has been awesome and can help any contender. I'd trade him, maybe he'd want to be included in a Dame package to join him on a new team. Problem with Grant is he's just getting past his prime and Blazers are so far from contending we're a few years from being with him where we now are with Dame. In hindsight Blazers should've traded Dame after the bubble.