Rate My Signature Thread

[Notorious]

actually, times new roman, arial, all of them are really good fonts. look at my vc wall. i used times new roman and georgia in there. its just the effects i did to it like gradient overlays and differnet things that make it look better.

 

[M Two One]

I meant that they shouldn't be the main focus. The fonts are too commonly used. Plain fonts come into use for certain images, otherwise it scars others.

 

[N4S]

 

[Master Shake]

<div class="quote_poster">N4S Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">

</div>

Not bad, but it is to crowded for me. At first I thought his head was over-sized. I say make it less crowded, then it should be sweet. Right now:

5/10


After

/10?

 

[N4S]

Wow, I didnt think it was that bad.

Your opinion though.

 

[Master Shake]

<div class="quote_poster">N4S Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Wow, I didnt think it was that bad.

Your opinion though.</div>

No it isn't bad, my 5 is because I find it crowded and hard to read. And that huge picture behind Chad makes it look weird. It is a good sig, just like you said was my opinion on it. I'll update my ranking to

7/10. 5 was a bit harsh

 

[Notorious]

naw that n4 sig is straight brotha. tone down your mosaic and its fan coo.

 

[NTC]

Dont bother rating this as I didnt put any time or effort into it, I just got the idea after seeing the 2 photos, and thought maybe some one might like to use it as a sig, so if so, feel free to use it.

 

[Butter]

I'll rate it because I like simple sigs. 7/10. Contrast looks good, just don't like the font.

Rate my latest courtesy of Trench.

 

[N4S]

Good concept but the flow seems a bit off. Think it might be that screen pattern or whatever. 6.5/10

Rate:

 

[N4S]

Man this thread is dead anymore.

JBB used to be GFX heaven.

Collab between me and Nasty:

 

[M Two One]

A bit faded looking with the brightness, but the concept is bitchin'. Nice work.

8.5/10

 

[hustler]

0/10 since it's Peyton.

9/10 without the hate.

 

[Master Shake]

9.5/10 Soild Sig, I like it a lot.

 

[M Two One]

Tell me what you think of this sig I created with Lazio footballers. I like it, I wanted to focus completely on the painting appareance of the players. No text, just lighting changes to focus out the background and highlight the faces differently, etc.

 

[Master Shake]

^9/10 I love it. It is simple and the focus on the players faces is amazing, Great sig.

 

[Apollo]

<div class="quote_poster">M Two One Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Tell me what you think of this sig I created with Lazio footballers. I like it, I wanted to focus completely on the painting appareance of the players. No text, just lighting changes to focus out the background and highlight the faces differently, etc.

</div>

Very cool sig, I`ll give it a 9/10.

 

[M Two One]

With this other Lazio footballers sig, I didn't know what I wanted to do at first. I kept thinking I'd just line the players up and instead make it into a wallpaper, but then I got the idea of making it appear like this. I don't think the sig as a real sig is all that great because there's more that can be done to this such as text, but I really liked the concept I had going so I saved it as PSD file to get some opinions now before I continue adding or changing anything. I used the five headlights lighting effect for this one and wanted to go for a more artistic feel like the previous one, but stray clear of copying it.

 

[hustler]

Sorry about skipping yours M Two, you and Master both get a 9/10 for me. Simple sigs work best.

 

[M Two One]

<div class="quote_poster">hustler Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Sorry about skipping yours M Two, you and Master both get a 9/10 for me. Simple sigs work best.</div>

Just wondering, which one of mine? The drawing looking first one, or the second one?

 

[hustler]

First.

 

[Master Shake]

I like the second one, but it makes me dizzy...lol

8/10