"
assumption" is a tricky tool
my assumption is that Dame isn't going ask out until, at the earliest, he sees how the off-season unfolds. Which would be toward the end of July. And the Blazers won't be discussing any trades for Dame until he asks out. So I just don't give any credibility, at all, to trade ideas for Dame that include the 2023 draft. Completely unrealistic
as for the Stepian rule, the pertinent part is this:
Teams are restricted from trading away future first round draft picks in consecutive years. This is known as the "Ted Stepien Rule." Stepien owned the Cavs from 1980-83, and made a series of bad trades (such as the 1980 trade mentioned above) that cost the Cavs several years' first round picks. As a result of Stepien's ineptitude, teams are now prevented from making trades which might leave them without a first round pick in consecutive future years.
When dealing with protected picks, the Stepien rule is interpreted to mean that a team can't trade a pick if there is any chance at all that it will leave the team without a first round pick in consecutive future drafts.
http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q89
and the encumbrance Miami has is:
View attachment 56066
so then, in mid-late July, and beyond, if Portland is discussing a Dame trade with Miami, the Heat's 2025 and 2026 first's are out of the conversation. OKC owns them both even though they will only get one or the other
and that means Miami can't trade their 2024 first. And since OKC might get Miami's 2026 first, the heat can't trade their 2027 first. So the only open Miami picks would be the three first's from 2028-2030. Meaning the best Portland can do, pick-wise from Miami is two first's and a swap 5-7 years from now (
this might be where somebody tries to argue Miami can trade their 2027 first contingent on yadayada, but that's meaningless)
and I really don't believe Pat Riley would trade unprotected 1st's that far out