- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,615
- Likes
- 44,232
- Points
- 113
Let's talk about guns.
A video that @dviss1 posted recently showed the inequities in police officers' treatment of a white man and a black man exercising their open carry rights (in a state in which it is legal). Separately, an article @magnifier661 posted recently talked about California's ban on open carry of firearms, and inconsistencies between counties regarding issuance of concealed carry permits. In it, it mentioned that the US Supreme Court has regularly ruled that the 2nd amendment clearly protects citizens' rights to owning guns in their homes, but they haven't really ruled on how the 2nd applies to carrying guns in public (whether concealed or open).
So it gets me to thinking, what is the most reasonable position regarding public carrying of firearms? Should all carrying be permitted without restriction? Is open carry preferable so that the surrounding public is aware of the presence of gun carriers in their midst? Is concealed carry preferable so as to prevent public discomfort/panic, as well as keeping potential criminals unaware of the possibility of civilian armed response? Would it be better to prohibit civilian public carry of firearms, allowing them only on the gun-owner's property or in-transit to/from authorized locations (hunting grounds, gun ranges, etc)? Should there be different carrying rules for handguns vs rifles (or mags' RPG), or should all guns be considered equal?
You can pick 3 of the 9 options in the poll--the intention is for you to pick 1 of each group of three poll options. I'm really curious to see where the forum comes down on this.
A video that @dviss1 posted recently showed the inequities in police officers' treatment of a white man and a black man exercising their open carry rights (in a state in which it is legal). Separately, an article @magnifier661 posted recently talked about California's ban on open carry of firearms, and inconsistencies between counties regarding issuance of concealed carry permits. In it, it mentioned that the US Supreme Court has regularly ruled that the 2nd amendment clearly protects citizens' rights to owning guns in their homes, but they haven't really ruled on how the 2nd applies to carrying guns in public (whether concealed or open).
So it gets me to thinking, what is the most reasonable position regarding public carrying of firearms? Should all carrying be permitted without restriction? Is open carry preferable so that the surrounding public is aware of the presence of gun carriers in their midst? Is concealed carry preferable so as to prevent public discomfort/panic, as well as keeping potential criminals unaware of the possibility of civilian armed response? Would it be better to prohibit civilian public carry of firearms, allowing them only on the gun-owner's property or in-transit to/from authorized locations (hunting grounds, gun ranges, etc)? Should there be different carrying rules for handguns vs rifles (or mags' RPG), or should all guns be considered equal?
You can pick 3 of the 9 options in the poll--the intention is for you to pick 1 of each group of three poll options. I'm really curious to see where the forum comes down on this.

