OT: Willie, Won’t He

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!



Clap+0.0.0.gif
 
Nice to live in a fantasy world like that, but in the real world, people judge and assume. and its common, thus rational.
It is rational to follow the dots and come up with a path, regardless if a few portions of that path are missing.

You may think its irrational, but its a majority thing, thus it is rational to most people to make the connections.

Yeah... I don't think that's a fantasy at all. And just because people do it all the time, that doesn't make it rational.

I teach my son differently. I teach him, get all the info and then make your decision. Guess I'm different and live in a fantasy world.
 
All of which are words that DON'T have to be censored. Since they don't, no one in the forum WOULD censor them.

Again,

giphy.gif
The site didn't sensor the word, he did. Meaning as a singular action, which is what you said you are judging it on, could have literally been any word, and ge just hit random symbols.

As a singular action, you have ZERO proof it was racist. If you take his body of work into account....which you said you weren't doing, it was most likely racist.
 
Yeah... I don't think that's a fantasy at all. And just because people do it all the time, that doesn't make it rational.

I teach my son differently. I teach him, get all the info and then make your decision. Guess I'm different and live in a fantasy world.
I think he quoted you on accident, and he was actually intending to reply to me and post #342 (I say this based on his referencing someone calling something irrational, which I did, but you didn't). The content of his reply makes a lot more sense in that context.
 
Yeah... I don't think that's a fantasy at all. And just because people do it all the time, that doesn't make it rational.

I teach my son differently. I teach him, get all the info and then make your decision. Guess I'm different and live in a fantasy world.

Wait man... you do realize I am arguing in your behalf right?
Have you now done a 180°????

Im saying its rational to connect the dots like you were doing before.

Am I missing something here?

Yes its always nice to have all the facts but sometimes only 80% of them are available. Yes it is rational for humans to take that 80% and come to a conclusion. Its fundamental human behavior.. solve the problem. Figure out whats missing, etc.
To say it is irrational I 100% disagree and we will have to agree to disagree.
Since the beginning of time, we have tried to connect the dots without having all the dots....It's 100% rational behavior.
 
Wait man... you do realize I am arguing in your behalf right?
Have you now done a 180°????

Im saying its rational to connect the dots like you were doing before.

Am I missing something here?

Yes its always nice to have all the facts but sometimes only 80% of them are available. Yes it is rational for humans to take that 80% and come to a conclusion. Its fundamental human behavior.. solve the problem. Figure out whats missing, etc.
To say it is irrational I 100% disagree and we will have to agree to disagree.
Since the beginning of time, we have tried to connect the dots without having all the dots....It's 100% rational behavior.

I read your post wrong. My bad.
 
(*^&#%(*&^@(*^^%()*()*@$^$!#@%)(&#%(*^&!@#)&*_)(@#%$&^#%*()&@$)(*&!#)(*^_)!@()*#%*&@!$)(&!&@%)&!(@%)(!@$*()!(*&^@%)(_*^&!@&^*(!^@%&)(&)@$%*^&!$^&*(@!%)&(#@^%)(!~!$%%)(&@%(*&@&*(^@%$)!(*)&@!%)&!$&)(@!%)(&!$#*^(!$&)(#%^)(&@^&**&^%~!#)(*&@#%)(*&!#(&*^^%)&!@*^&%%$(*&!@*(&#%^(*&!*&^@#$^&*%@%(*^!@$(*^@!%&*^!~@(*&#@%(*!^&%@$(#%**&!@$(*^@%$(*!@*&^%$^#!!!!$^@!(*!$*(^$*^$#####$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$*^&*%&@!)(^&()&@*(^#%(*^^*(&!@&^@%(*^&
Oh, no you didn't! :(
 
The site didn't sensor the word, he did. Meaning as a singular action, which is what you said you are judging it on, could have literally been any word, and ge just hit random symbols.

As a singular action, you have ZERO proof it was racist. If you take his body of work into account....which you said you weren't doing, it was most likely racist.

There isn't a single person in this forum that censors themselves for no reason. It's literally never happened. MFs say what they want unless they HAVE to censor it.

GTFO.... Stop giving the racists cover....
 
There isn't a single person in this forum that censors themselves for no reason. It's literally never happened. MFs say what they want unless they HAVE to censor it.

GTFO.... Stop giving the racists cover....

There are times I've wanted to call certain people on this forum some really bad things.
However that wouldn't do anything but get really bad things said to me in return.
So if I choose to respond, I then attempt to get them to see things another way I end up typing things out multiple times.
I'd say that's censoring ones self.
 
There isn't a single person in this forum that censors themselves for no reason. It's literally never happened. MFs say what they want unless they HAVE to censor it.

GTFO.... Stop giving the racists cover....
No cover given.
 
Sly is a @#%&$.

Again, not a personal insult. That 5 letter word could be Brick, Buick, Straw, Flask, Plume, etc.
 
Droughns is one of my all time favorite Ducks. That dude was a fucking beast.




Droughns was tougher than a two dollar steak. Don't give me the huge bruisers like Blount or the cutters like McCaffrey. Give me the little guy who deliberately runs into two huge linebackers and grinds out 5 more yards. Love that shit!
 
Last edited:
That was really dumb.

Banned.

Yes, I still have your address and will mail out your prize. Sorry I waited so long.

Damnit, I just got on and saw that. I wanted to be the badass banner of the day.

*hangs up cowboy hat, gun belt, and shot glass. Slides a $5 to the bartender and slowly walks out of the bar*
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top