What do you think is the main problem?

Pick one.

Same one I picked back in September. Lack of talent.

nurk is the main problem

now trade him

Roster sucks

Is the roster genuinely worse than in the Aminu-Harkless years?

Ownership.

There are many factors but I think that we have lost some very winnable games due to coaching ineptitude.

I don't believe Chauncey knows how to get the most out of his players (which, Stotts seemed to do, to at least some degree) and I've seen nothing with respect to an offensive scheme to take greatest advantage of the skills of each player. Defense, one of what we thought would be his calling cards is again, largely non-existent.

Yes, there is a talent component here but I think that with subpar coaching, it requires a higher degree of talent to get the same success and even then, it may not be able to overcome lesser talent with superior coaching in a playoff series.

Rastapopoulos said:

Is the roster genuinely worse than in the Aminu-Harkless years?

Click to expand...

Hell yes!!!!

THE HCP said:

Hell yes!!!!

Click to expand...

Wow. I guess during that winning streak at the start of the season, Chauncey must've been John Fucking Wooden.

All of these play a part. The roster is terribly balanced and relies on players playing out of position. Chauncey is a first time coach in his second year...playing the game is a lot different than coaching the game. Chauncey is set on it being his way but sometimes as coach you have to build a game plan around the team, not continually force them into something that's not working.

The Blazers have the lowest scoring bench in the NBA. A big part of that is injuries. Little, Winslow, and Payton II, main pieces of the bench have all missed alot of games, leaving the Blazers shorthanded and the starters to play heavy minutes.

That backcourt pairing of Dame and Simons is high octane offensively like Dame and CJ were. But, like with CJ you have two players who aren't playing off of each other and who both need the ball. Also, while Dame has improved defensively, Simons is atrocious on defense.

There does seem to be a lack of something. Is it effort? Maybe chemistry? Alot of nights they aren't clicking as a team while opponents are all playing with each other and using that to kick our ass. The Blazers are a turnover machine this year. That seems to be indicative of a tired starting 5 but also of a team that is lacking synergy.

Nurk gets more blame than he deserves. The main problem with him is Chauncey is using him wrong. He needs to work more at cultivating his shot at the basket than developing that three. He isn't Jokic and he shouldn't try to be.

The Blazers do rely on Dame too much. When he is clicking, the rest of the team stands and watches and are not active. They are too hesitant and unconfident in themselves. Dame should never record 50 points in a loss. Dame is picking up everyone else's slack. Everyone not named Dame on the team needs to step up.

GrandpaBlaze said:

There are many factors but I think that we have lost some very winnable games due to coaching ineptitude.

I don't believe Chauncey knows how to get the most out of his players (which, Stotts seemed to do, to at least some degree) and I've seen nothing with respect to an offensive scheme to take greatest advantage of the skills of each player. Defense, one of what we thought would be his calling cards is again, largely non-existent.

Yes, there is a talent component here but I think that with subpar coaching, it requires a higher degree of talent to get the same success and even then, it may not be able to overcome lesser talent with superior coaching in a playoff series.

Click to expand...

I think Chauncey is trying to coach "the right way" - lots of ball movement, etc. - while Stotts just thought "fuck it, how can I maximize having my two best players be undersized gunners?" I like Chauncey's method better (because I like that style of basketball much more than the cautious, plod-it-up-the-court game that seems to suit Dame best) but there's no question that Stotts got more wins out of teams built round Dame (and CJ).

Need more consistent even play from the team.

The biggest problem is posters who think they are capable of doing a job better than someone who is paid millions of dollars to do that job.

Chris Craig said:

Nurk gets more blame than he deserves. The main problem with him is Chauncey is using him wrong. He needs to work more at cultivating his shot at the basket than developing that three. He isn't Jokic and he shouldn't try to be.

Click to expand...

Remember how Plumlee looked like a poor man's Domatas Sabonis (so a poor POOR man's Jokic) for a while there because Stotts unlocked his passing? And then when we acquired Nurk, he was plugged into that role, and his passing really expanded? But then, perhaps because of the cost of turnovers when your defense sucks, Stotts minimized that role for him? I kinda wish we could go back to that again. I mean, Sacramento has managed to make two non-shooters (Sabonis and Fox) be the engine that drives perhaps the best offense in the league. Either that or just trade back for Plumlee (he's having a pretty solid season!)

Rastapopoulos said:

Is the roster genuinely worse than in the Aminu-Harkless years?

Click to expand...

The fact that you asked this question is hilarious.

Just for example our 2017-18 roster was Dame, CJ, Moe, Chief, Nurk, ET, Meyers, Phys Ed, Zach, Layman, PatCon, Shabazz, Vonleh and Biggie.

BlazerWookee said:

The biggest problem is posters who think they are capable of doing a job better than someone who is paid millions of dollars to do that job.

Click to expand...

So: the biggest problem WITH THE TEAM is ITS FANS?

BlazerWookee said:

The biggest problem is posters who think they are capable of doing a job better than someone who is paid millions of dollars to do that job.

Click to expand...

I'm not a pilot, but if I see a helicopter upside down in a tree I'm pretty sure someone fucked up.

Lack of talent seems like the obvious choice.

Would've considered ownership had it been a choice.

Dame/Ant pairing: Stop putting no D chuckers next to Dame.


Honorable mention to ownership who seems to care more about not going a few million into the luxury tax than getting the players we need.

HomerLovesKoolAid said:

Dame/Ant pairing: Stop putting no D chuckers next to Dame.

Honorable mention to ownership who seems to care more about not going a few million into the luxury tax than getting the players we need.

Click to expand...

I'm really hoping that changes with this deadline and offseason

I need more than one choice to answer the question. It's the bench, injuries, imbalanced roster and lack of chemistry with a set rotation...some of it is Chauncey's lack of endgame experience as well.

riverman said:

I'm really hoping that changes with this deadline and offseason

Click to expand...

GEORGE IS GETTIN UPSET!!

System/best player

what I mean by that is your trying to run a system that isn’t condusive to your best players strengths. He’s a pick and roll player who excels with ball in his hands. Problem is when you play tough teams they trap the shit out of Dame and then the offense breaks down.

I still think there’s a chance that we could win if you added a player like A Davis who kill in pick and roll with Dame. Other than that I think we are doomed.

Won’t be title contender but if I was GM I think we really need to trade Nurk for shot blocker. Gobert would be ideal but if not then surround Dame with long 3 and d guys. Hope your defense stops teams and Dame is able to win close games.

1 Eye Jack said:

System/best player

what I mean by that is your trying to run a system that isn’t condusive to your best players strengths. He’s a pick and roll player who excels with ball in his hands. Problem is when you play tough teams they trap the shit out of Dame and then the offense breaks down.

I still think there’s a chance that we could win if you added a player like A Davis who kill in pick and roll with Dame. Other than that I think we are doomed.

Won’t be title contender but if I was GM I think we really need to trade Nurk for shot blocker. Gobert would be ideal but if not then surround Dame with long 3 and d guys. Hope your defense stops teams and Dame is able to win close games.

Click to expand...

I agree with this for the most part but as great as Dame is, his biggest weakness seems to be decisions/ passing out of a trap, and he still is poor at throwing lob passes which would seriously suck if AD was the P and R guy.

Talent. Need a high level all star

BlazerWookee said:

The biggest problem is posters who think they are capable of doing a job better than someone who is paid millions of dollars to do that job.

Click to expand...

Criticism is a part of fielding a shitty team

calvin natt said:

Talent. Need a high level all star

Click to expand...

We kind of did Grant has been better than advertised and is playing at all star level and we still aren’t winning consistently.

Honest question here and not a troll question, but can a championship team be built around Dame? His greatest attribute is his scoring. He has always worked off having the ball in his hands, but by doing that it takes a toll on the team. If you add scorers around him, will there be enough touches to keep everybody happy? If you add defensive players around him, then it puts more focus on him to score and easily be defended. An offense with player and ball movement is most ideal, but can he be happy in that offense? He has been here with many different players and styles and we are always in the same situation. I don't know if championship teams require to be led by the greatest talent or a by guys with the ability to be adaptable making others around them better. I truly don't know the answer.

blazerkor said:

The fact that you asked this question is hilarious.

Just for example our 2017-18 roster was Dame, CJ, Moe, Chief, Nurk, ET, Meyers, Phys Ed, Zach, Layman, PatCon, Shabazz, Vonleh and Biggie.

Click to expand...

And you think that's a more talented team than this team?!?

It was injuries.

/Thread since it's now answered and unarguable.