JoshuaHall
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
- Messages
- 1,298
- Likes
- 1,387
- Points
- 113
If they traded LMA the only way they get that 25m + assets is if they had traded for expirings. They wouldve had to take back salary?
I mean i get what you’re saying. I just dont think it was all that devastating. Mightve been.
Yeah, that’s what I said, right?
Trade him for expiring contracts plus picks. The expiring contracts would’ve expired in 3 months or whatever and we would’ve had at least 1 additional draft pick — and that’s being more than lenient — in my opinion. So, we retain cap space plus add assets.
Probably could’ve fielded legitimate packages on top of that.
We can agree to disagree! That has by far been the most devastating thing to happen recently, in my opinion. Can’t just let all stars walk away from the franchise with “cap space” to show for it. I mean, I believe Paul George even brought up the fact the whole reason he finally admitted he wanted a trade was so that the pacers didn’t get fucked.
I truly believe there was a small shot LMA would’ve stayed which would be the best counterpoint and arguably why he didn’t request a trade privately, but it wasn’t worth the risk in my opinion. Too many red flags (before hearing the post season articles).