KingSpeed
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 63,270
- Likes
- 22,454
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then you better be ready for the Blazers to pony up CJ.I swear, if hew goes to GSW, Im done watching basketball.
Then you better be ready for the Blazers to pony up CJ.
CJ for Paul George sounds so much better or CJ for Brendan Haywood or CJ for Klay Thompson ...giving up CJ for another big isn't solving our problem
If you need a guard back if you move CJ...if you can do both, sure...I take AD all day long over CJSo to play devils advocate, you wouldn't trade CJ for AD?
Depends on the Center. And it depends on who fills CJ's shoes.
GSW are a fucking dynasty either way dude.Not happening. We can get Noel for much much much less and serve close to the same purpose.
But if GSW adds him even with giving up Thompson, I will be pissed....
Hahahaha![]()
This thread is from Dec 2016...….and it is as legitimate as any trade machine crap that's been hashed over and over and over...…..in 2016 many people would have traded CJ for a centerAnother thread quoting this bullshit news source? This message board man... @KingSpeed you're too smart to think this article has any sort of legitimacy.
thisAre we so bored that we are looking through peoples posts from three years ago to rub their noses in it? Blazer fans should be better than that.
Riverman, the post you quoted was from the same day.This thread is from Dec 2016...….and it is as legitimate as any trade machine crap that's been hashed over and over and over...…..in 2016 many people would have traded CJ for a center
I don't bump threads.....I go to the newest posts and read through.....I had to check the date to see when it was created after reading it. Calling out KS for suggesting a trade in 2016 by someone who has suggested a billion trades gives me pause......I'll stand by my postRiverman, the post you quoted was from the same day.
You're calling out a post from 3 years ago too, so ironically you're calling him out for something you're doing not him.I don't bump threads.....I go to the newest posts and read through.....I had to check the date to see when it was created after reading it. Calling out KS for suggesting a trade in 2016 by someone who has suggested a billion trades gives me pause......I'll stand by my post
Bones wasn't calling him out for suggesting a trade three years ago; he was calling him out at the time for linking to a "BS source" as the basis for the thread.I don't bump threads.....I go to the newest posts and read through.....I had to check the date to see when it was created after reading it. Calling out KS for suggesting a trade in 2016 by someone who has suggested a billion trades gives me pause......I'll stand by my post
Bones wasn't calling him out for suggesting a trade three years ago; he was calling him out at the time for linking to a "BS source" as the basis for the thread.
I agree with that--I was talking about his response to Bones' post from 2016, not his agreement with your comment about the bump.Labinot was the one who bumped the old thread. I agree with Riverman that bumping an old thread just to laugh at someone is not constructive and should not be encouraged.
The thread title isn't about linking a thread...it's posed as a question...however KS came up with his question is no reason to be told..."you're smarter than this".....but hey....it's not going to change much at this point. One might say any editorial that doesn't turn out as projected is a BS source …..my 2 cents would be to address the thread question and not discount the reading material of the creator of a thread.....some call CNN a bullshit source...some call Fox news a bullshit source....in the end like us, they're all just talking headsBones wasn't calling him out for suggesting a trade three years ago; he was calling him out at the time for linking to a "BS source" as the basis for the thread.
here we go....so you're calling me out for calling him out for calling KS out.....I seeYou're calling out a post from 3 years ago too, so ironically you're calling him out for something you're doing not him.
Still an interesting look at the way things were viewed at the time.
It's funny to me that this was talked about. Not what the people said. But more the subject and the way players were viewed. I would never have thought about trading CJ at the time for Whiteside but you have to admit at the time it was much more plausible than today.
And now we have both!